Transgender and nonbinary individuals would obtain extra specific protections in Colorado’s anti-bias and harassment legislation if a newly launched invoice turns into legislation.
Advocates characterize the invoice as a easy legislative repair to make sure gender identification and expression are protected throughout state legislation, whereas additionally sending a message about Colorado’s values.
“(The invoice) ensures nonbinary and trans individuals are seen and represented in each a part of Colorado legislation, which is particularly vital now with the wave of anti-trans rhetoric and laws throughout the nation,” stated Garrett Royer, political director for LGBTQ advocacy group One Colorado. “It helps the state stay a pacesetter on LGBTQ rights with a quite simple legislative repair.”
State nondiscrimination statutes already particularly shield individuals based mostly on their gender identification and gender expression with regards to areas akin to public lodging, housing and employment, Royer stated.
This modification would add gender identification and expression to Colorado’s bias-motivated crimes statute, which is aimed extra at person-to-person harassment and intimidation.
Royer stated gender identification was typically coated underneath sexual orientation protections beforehand, however this modification would add readability. These protections additionally would come with harassment based mostly on different individuals’s perceptions of the sufferer’s identification.
Senate Invoice 189 is sponsored by Democratic Sens. Rhonda Fields of Aurora and Chris Hansen of Denver. Its first committee listening to is about for Monday.
“The No. 1 cause for hate crimes relies on gender identification and expression,” Fields stated. “These of us are attacked and bullied greater than every other demographic, and it’s not in our statute because it pertains to having particular safety. So it’s simply that easy.”
This proposal comes because the legislature has debated different payments geared toward defending gender identification. Two payments regarding people’ most popular names had been the topic of prolonged, contentious debates and testimony rife with anti-transgender arguments as they moved by means of the Home.
Hansen, who joined a voice vote in help of a invoice to permit non-legal identify modifications in colleges on Thursday morning, stated these are separate debates.
These payments suggest extra important modifications, he stated, whereas this one would fill “a spot” in state statutes and definitions.
“We wish to ensure that we’re masking transgender points in (the anti-bias) statute and this can be a quite simple invoice to do this,” Hansen stated.
Keep up-to-date with Colorado Politics by signing up for our weekly publication, The Spot.